Wednesday, July 27, 2011

A question for the reader: Oman for Gay Expat?

While I'm away, one I'd like to pass to my many readers and facebook fans.

Answers please (as comments) to a fellow reader of Muscat Confidential, who asks:

Hello there,

I may be moving to Oman, I am from [Somewhere in Europe] and I am gay. I have a partner and we have been together for 6 years. We are thinking about getting married.

Now I have the chance to move to Oman for work and we are quite worried about him getting a visa. Since homosexual acts, per se, are outlawed, I would like some recommendation by perhaps another expat on how to proceed when requesting the visa. Should we say we are married? should we look for an alternative?

By Anonymous on Sexual Adventures in Oman on 7/26/11


Over to you. My answer soon.

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Apologies - still alive, just still on vacation

Readers,

I realise I've not posted for a while. Sorry if I worried any of you.*

All is fine in the Dragon's Lair.

I'm still on vacation. Or Holiday, depending where you are. I got very busy flying all around collecting treasure and spending quality time with Ms Dragon. And then I went on vacation.

I'll be back on-line presently. It's all been pretty quiet in Muscat anyhow it seems, and with all the joys a summer Ramadan is about to kick in, I guess it's 'run away' to other places for a while for many of you as well!

Meanwhile, send me emails if you have any news.


* No, no conspiracy, not in/just out of prison, nor ill, nor in any dire straights what so ever. Nor am I in Oman.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

New Amnesty appeal for latest arrests. Protesters in court. HM makes CBS list of World's enduring Dictatorships.



Amnesty International have just updated their campaign in support of the arrested peaceful protesters. They also report the verdicts from todays trial in Al Khuwair.

OMAN MUST CHARGE OR RELEASE DETAINED PROTESTERS
Since February, Omanis have called for change in largely peaceful protests
© Demotix

18 May 2011
The Omani authorities must say where and why they are holding some six people arrested during a recent peaceful protest in the capital Muscat, Amnesty International said today, as more than two dozen others faced trial on protest-related charges.

Fifteen people were arrested by Omani security forces on 14 May during a protest in Muscat calling for the release of others detained two days earlier in pro-reform protests.

Prominent female lawyer Basma al-Kiyumi was released on 16 May, and on 17 May some eight other activists were released, among them Muhammad al-Habssi and Ibrahim Sa’id al-Hajri. It is not known where the remaining six – including Nabhan al-Hanashi – are, or if any charges have been brought against them.

“The authorities in Oman must immediately provide details on the whereabouts of all protesters being held and either charge them with a recognizable criminal offence or release them,” said Malcolm Smart, Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa Programme Director.

“If they are being detained solely for participating in a peaceful public protest they should be released immediately and unconditionally.”

“Any charges should be made public, and trials against the accused must conform to international fair trial standards.”

Amnesty International is concerned that those who continue to be held following the protest in Muscat on 14 May are being detained incommunicado and may be at risk of torture or ill-treatment.

Basma al-Kiyumi was charged in connection with participating in an unlawful gathering and released on bail to await trial at future date. It is not clear if other protesters who were released on 17 May were charged or not.

Another group of 27 men who had taken part in protests during March and April appeared before a Muscat court today and were charged with a number of offences including banditry, setting fire to government buildings, and insulting officials. The men pleaded not guilty and the case was adjourned until 23 May. Two of the men, Khaled al-Hantholi, and ‘Ammar al-Hani’i, were not granted bail and remain detained at the Central Prison.

At least three people have been killed and others injured during recent public protests in Oman amid allegations that the security forces have used excessive force against protesters. Many people have been arrested, including dozens who were detained in the northern city of Sohar on 29 March.
...





More 'Oman in the news'
CBS, mega US media corp, just released their latest edition of 'Enduring Dictators, show casing all the world's dictatorships. Naturally, it's Oman. There are a few small errors, but, this is how Oman is seen in some circles.

CBS News: Enduring Dictators.
May 18, 2011 4:54 PM

The world's enduring dictators: Qaboos bin Said, Oman

By Joshua Norman

Oman's leader Sultan Qaboos bin Said attends the third day of celebrations marking 40 years since he took the throne at Midan al-Fath Stadium in Muscat on December 1, 2010. (Credit: Getty Images) This is an installment in the WorldWatch series, "The world's enduring dictators," inspired by events in Tunisia and Egypt, in which CBSNews.com takes a look at the men who continue to rule their lands unimpeded by law. See a complete explanation of the series and a list of others profiled here.
Qaboos bin Said, Oman



Length of rule: 41 years.
Sultan Qaboos took the throne in 1970 after deposing his father in a palace coup, and has put his stamp on his country in many ways, even changing its name from "Muscat and Oman" to the "Sultanate of Oman." His part of the Arabian peninsula has been ruled by the al-Said family since 1744.

Most despotic acts:
The current "Arab Spring"-inspired protests in the country have seen at least two deaths. Protesters have complained about rampant government corruption, high unemployment and the lack of a parliament with legislative powers. There has been several waves of arrests of anti-government protestors amid an ongoing and aggressive crackdown against discontent. Although Oman has been accused of human trafficking - especially of foreign laborers - for some time, the government has allegedly begun enforcing laws against on the practice.

Outlook for change:
As mentioned earlier, several protest leaders have been detained and released in rolling waves of arrests in the past few months, and dissatisfaction with the state of affairs in the country is high. While disgruntlement amongst the populace is obvious, the extreme dearth of foreign press coverage and lack of general press freedom there leaves it unclear as to whether the protesters want the sultan to leave, or simply want their government to function better. Beyond the recent protests, there is concern about succession in the country, as there is no heir apparent or any clear legislation on who may be the next Sultan.



Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503543_162-20064069-503543.html#ixzz1MkSaLBG1

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Oman's heavy handed treatment of peaceful protestors may catch the Global media's attention.

Tension remains high in Salalah, as the families and friends of those arrested on Thursday & Friday - having been rounded up by the Army for protesting via a sit-in outside the Governor's place downtown - are now forming a second protest outside the local prison demanding their release.

According to reports from Salalah local blogger Dhofari Gucci, several of the protests lead 'speakers' were arrested and immediately taken back to Muscat "...namely Nasser Sakroon, Bakhit Al Mahri, Fahim Al Mashani, Salim Al Mashani, Amer Hardan , and others...."

Oman does not provide its citizens subjects the right of habeous corpus**, and so I presume these gentlemen are getting the extended VIP tour of the Dark Castle, ISS's brand new mega-bunker-fortress up above Qurm.

Photo 23.589849, 58.477162: Oman's Internal Security Services new building: The Dark Castle. The Government is currently hosting extended tours for a few lucky representatives of Salalah-based human rights activists.

The Ministry of Information dismissed the press release and described the arrests as yet another example of the caring nature of Oman's Government: "We're simply giving these long suffering protesters a chance to get away from it all, with an unforgetable trip away, and all expenses paid too. It's an experience I'm hoping our guests will find quite... enlightening." The Minister of the Interior added, "We've always been a Government that listens to the people. In the case of our new guests from Salalah, we'll even be recording what they say! I think reasonable people will see how we want to hear absolutely everything they have to tell us."



Meanwhile,
News of the surprise round-up of what had been a generally peaceful scene has reached the wire services, and despite the dominance of extremely violent reports coming from Syria and Yemen, Oman's news often made the editorial cut too. So far, Sultan Qaboos is still generally being portrayed as responding with moderation. So far.

But the release of an international press statement condemning the arrests of "human rights activists" issued by 'a group of Omani Activists', and picked up by wire service AFP, was soon appearing on hundreds of media outlets, including The LA Times (see a few others below*). At a stroke, this has successfully branded the protesters as the good guys. Does Oman News Agency not realise that by refering to them with words like "provocateurs" and "attempt[ing] to incite sedition", it makes HM sound just like Ghaddafi or Ahmadinejad?

Omani authorities have carried out a wave of arrests against human rights activists calling for reforms in the Gulf monarchy, a group of activists says in a statement received by AFP on Tuesday.

"We strongly condemn the repression and restrictions to the legitimate right of activists to express themselves peacefully," said the statement. The activists described the "arrests targeting those who were calling for rational dialogue" as "disappointing".


Great PR for the (un-named) 'activists'. The protesters are learning fast.

I think the Government's agressive move on what was a peaceful sit-in was pretty damn stupid. They could have just left them there, harmlessly talking to each other and delegations of minor civil servants, while in the real world simply by-passing them, ignoring most of their 'demands' and doing what-ever the Government wanted. If the protesters ever really got out of hand and used violence, then they could properly arrest those breaking the law, and deal with them in the courts.

Detaining people against their will for the "seditious crime" of peacefully sitting around and voicing an opinion comes across as simultaneously despotic and weak. Doing under cover of night with APCs & military troops from the north of the country, while shutting down the internet and mobile phones... well, it just lets everyone around the world play the 'spot the dictatorship' game.

For now, HM's reasonable reputation is standing. But that won't last very long.

I can only suggest readers support Amnesty International's approach to this. While they have not yet responded to the latest arrests, from their recent release about the earlier detention of the Sohar protesters, here is the informattion you need:

PLEASE WRITE IMMEDIATELY in Arabic, English or your own language:
 Welcome the release without charge of those arrested following the protests in Sohar and Muscat;
 Urge the authorities to ensure that the at least nine men who remain detained are protected from torture and other
ill-treatment, and given regular access to their families, lawyers and any medical attention they may require;
 Call for their immediate and unconditional release if they are prisoners of conscience held solely for peacefully
exercising their rights to freedom of expression and assembly; otherwise they should be released unless they are
promptly charged with recognizable criminal offences and tried in conformity with international fair trial standards;
 Ask for details of any charges brought against them and clarification of their current legal status and whereabouts
in detention.

PLEASE SEND APPEALS BEFORE 2 JUNE 2011 TO:

His Majesty Sultan Qaboos bin Sa’id
Head of State, Prime Minister, Foreign
Affairs, Defence and Finance Minister
Diwan of the Royal Court
The Palace, Muscat 113
Sultanate of Oman
Fax: +968 24 735 375

Salutation: Your Majesty


His Excellency Sayyid Hamoud bin
Faisal bin Said Al Busaidi
Minister of the Interior
Ministry of Interior
PO Box 127
Ruwi 112, Muscat
Sultanate of Oman

Salutation: Your Excellency


And copies to:
Mohammed bin Abdullah Al Riyam i
Chairman
National Human Rights Commission
P.O.Box 29, Postal Code: 103
Bareq A' Shati, Muscat, Sultanate of
Oman
Fax: +968 24648801
Email: enquiry@nhrc.om


Also send copies to diplomatic representatives accredited to your country. Please check with your section office if sending appeals after the above
date. This is the first update of UA 96/11. Further information: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/MDE20/001/2011/en




* Reports:
AFP, Iran TV, the medialine, Zaywa, etc.




** Habeous Corpus
I'd recommend to interested readers the history of this important principal of English common law. (from wikipedia): The first recorded usage of habeas corpus was in 1305, during the reign of King Edward I. However, other writs were issued with the same effect as early as the reign of Henry II in the twelfth century. Blackstone explained the basis of the writ, saying "The King is at all times entitled to have an account, why the liberty of any of his subjects is restrained, wherever that restraint may be inflicted."

Indeed. Note this does not prevent people being held without trial where such things are deemed legal, nor does it ensure a fair trail. But it does force an explanation of their imprisonment, which only seem just.


wiki again:
...
The writ of habeas corpus is one of what are called the "extraordinary", "common law", or "prerogative writs", which were historically issued by the English courts in the name of the monarch to control inferior courts and public authorities within the kingdom. The most common of the other such prerogative writs are quo warranto, prohibito, mandamus, procedendo, and certiorari. The due process for such petitions is not simply civil or criminal, because they incorporate the presumption of non-authority. The official who is the respondent has the burden to prove his authority to do or not do something. Failing this, the court must decide for the petitioner, who may be any person, not just an interested party. This differs from a motion in a civil process in which the movant must have standing, and bears the burden of proof.
...

Sunday, May 15, 2011

UAE - as always, best avoided. Crown Prince Al Nahyan sets up mercenary army

It's long been the advice of Muscat Confidential that the UAE is 'best avoided'. A thin veneer of oil wealth supplied shiny stuff barely covers a culture of intolerance and expat exploitation. There is little true rule of law.

As recently commented in the previous post, The New York Times has just broken a big story that Sheik Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan has established a secret UAE based mercenary army in copperation with Blackwater founder Eric Prince. The outfit, staffed with mercs from Latin America to South Africa [but specifically no Muslims] is tasked with a mission scope that includes suppressing local riots, from expat labour camps or locals, plus defending islands from occupation by a few Iranians.

Photo: Effective ruler of the UAE, Sheik Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan.

While the unit was set up long before the Arab Spring swept the region, old Ghaddafi has shown that when you're a dictator it's useful to have a few rentals on hand who have no qualms shooting the local civilian populace.

...
Mr. Prince, who resettled here last year after his security business faced mounting legal problems in the United States, was hired by the crown prince of Abu Dhabi to put together an 800-member battalion of foreign troops for the U.A.E., according to former employees on the project, American officials and corporate documents obtained by The New York Times.

The force is intended to conduct special operations missions inside and outside the country, defend oil pipelines and skyscrapers from terrorist attacks and put down internal revolts, the documents show. Such troops could be deployed if the Emirates faced unrest in their crowded labor camps or were challenged by pro-democracy protests like those sweeping the Arab world this year.

The U.A.E.’s rulers, viewing their own military as inadequate, also hope that the troops could blunt the regional aggression of Iran, the country’s biggest foe, the former employees said. The training camp, located on a sprawling Emirati base called Zayed Military City, is hidden behind concrete walls laced with barbed wire. Photographs show rows of identical yellow temporary buildings, used for barracks and mess halls, and a motor pool, which houses Humvees and fuel trucks. The Colombians, along with South African and other foreign troops, are trained by retired American soldiers and veterans of the German and British special operations units and the French Foreign Legion, according to the former employees and American officials.
...


It's a long article. You can read it in full here.


Meanwhile, a UAE man was busted in Thailand while attempting to board a 1st class flight to Dubai with carry on that contained a baby leopard, panther, bear and monkeys. He obviously wasn't too worried about being searched on arrival in the UAE...

Post-script: The smuggler was one Noor Mahmoodr, a 36 year old male from UAE, according to freeland.org. No word on who he was smuggling them for...

UAE: Best avoided.

Saturday, May 14, 2011

123Orion May charity gig huge success (as usual!). Government patience snaps in Dhofar, everybody arrested




As the powers that be open up a giant can of military-backed wuppass on the peaceful demonstrators in Salalah, using a huge force of army troops + ROP & ISS + teargas, and switching off south Oman's entire mobile phone network and internet for 2 hours while doing so, it's good to know good folks have been keeping it real in Muscat.

123Orion's sell out charity gig in Muscat on May 5th raised 360 rials [US$900] for the Japanese Earthquake victims.

Photo" 123Orion rock the house for earthquake victims.

Well done JON G. Wish I could have been there.


Meanwhile in Salalah, things are going to get worse I suspect. Hopefully no-where near neighbouring Yemeni levels, but Dhofaris are not the sort to take being forced to shut up lying down. Keep checking Dhofari Gucci for latest news folks.

Sitting around in a roundabout calling for investigations into Ministerial corruption is, of course, extremely illegal in Oman.

Someone's patience has clearly expired.

PS
As posted in a comment on Muscat Mutterings, the Oman News Agency explained the situation quite clearly, here repeated in the Oman Observer (The Government owned newspaper):

Provocateurs held
Fri, 13 May 2011
MUSCAT — An official security source said security and military authorities yesterday arrested a number of provocateurs in Muscat Governorate and Wilayat of Salalah.
The source said deliberate inciting of rioting and public disorder by the detainees has reached a level that necessitated intervention to prevent them from continuing to break the law and stop their attempts to incite sedition, which has nothing to do with the public interest.

The source said security authorities commends citizens and those who co-operated for they know the real intentions of those persons who committed the unacceptable and who have no justification to continue gatherings and sit-ins. The authorities affirmed they will not hesitate to apply the law and protect the security of citizens and the nation.


Quite right. Sit-ins are very provocative.

repost JIC - Capital Area Yacht Centre under attack by new Minister of Tourism

Blogger acting up, so reporting just in case, with restores comments: check them out!

Photo: Capital Area Yacht Centre, CAYC, Oman. Marina Bandar Rowdha is just visible next door.

Background
Regular readers will know that Muscat's Capital Area Yacht Centre has been under attack from the Ministry of Tourism and their various bully-boys (such as OMRAN) for some time.

The previous Minister of Tourism, HE Rajiha bint Abd al-Amir bin Ali, recently passed away after loosing a battle with cancer. She was replaced by Mohsin Bin Mohammed Al Shaikh in February, but he was swiftly moved on in the big March-protests' cabinet reshuffle to become an advisor at the Diwan of Royal Court with Ministerial rank.

His replacement, Sheikh Abdulmalik bin Abdullah bin Ali al Khalili, was perhaps a surprising choice for Minister of Tourism. Previously he was strictly a money-man, chairman of BankMuscat and chairman of the Board's Audit Committee since 2001. Additionally, he served as the executive president of the Pension Fund of the Diwan of the Royal Court.

He might be new in the job, but his underlings made sure he got right onto the CAYC.


New Minister refuses to meet 'Expats'.
Demands CAYC move

I'm reliably told that HE Sheikh Abdulmalik requested a meeting on 25th April with CAYC's representatives in order to 'discuss the future of CAYC'. All the elected CAYC committee members** duly attended at the Ministry, but after being kept waiting for over an hour, they were informed that the minister would not meet the committee because there were two British expatriates present. He only wanted to talk to Omanis.

Really. (I wonder what he's got against expats? Maybe they don't respond as easily to the ol' Vitamin W?)

A new meeting was thus arranged for May 3rd, with only the Omani committee members present as instructed. They attended the meeting and were then told by the good Sheikh Abdulmalik that CAYC had to move to Azaiba, and the present beach would be made into a 'public beach'. End discussion. (Afterall, the Ministry of Tourism is reknowned for doing things for the benefit of the Omani public. Just look at what they did to Yeti, a beautiful public beach*.)

Azaiba, of course, is a pretty terrible place for a yacht club, being on a long stretch of boring sandy beach far away from the nice rocky bits one would actually sail a boat around. Places like, er, exactly where CAYC is already located. Although perhaps a banker can be excused for not knowing that.

I do have to wonder if the new Minister actually got a proper unbiased briefing of the CAYC situation (e.g. summary of previous meetings, Directives from H.M., and all the various court cases) from his senior advisor and Director of Tourism Mr. Mohammed Ali Said?


Photo: One of Oman’s most influential tourism figures.


Because the very same Mohammed Ali Said is also on the steering committee of the Marina Bandar Al Rowdha next door to CAYC. Rumour has it he has vowed to take the beach from CAYC for use by the Marina. Coincidentally, the Marina has been struggling financially ever since it opened, and does not currently have a nice beach of its own.

It seems very odd that The Ministry of Tourism feel themselves to be under no obligation to respect the title to the land personally given by His Majesty Sultan Qaboos to the CAYC.

[from CACY website]
His Excellency Mohammed Zubair officially opened the Capital Area Yacht Centre located on a beach, which was known locally as ‘Lone Tree Beach’, near Sidab on Saturday 2nd June 1979. This was the culmination of a good deal of community spirit, effort and imagination and very soon blossomed into the success story of Lone Tree Beach. The intention was to provide a safe beach and boat club with social facilities and amenities open to all residents of Oman, and also to provide a relaxed meeting place.
...
A meeting was held in the Ruwi Hotel in December 1976 to discuss the possibile formation of a beach club in Oman and a site was selected in the Sidab area then known as Lone Tree Beach. His Majesty Sultan Qaboos Bin Said, graciously granted the use of the land on condition that the Club should be open to anyone resident in Oman, and that it should be financially self-sufficient....


The centre can be joined by any resident of Oman to this day, and is financially self sufficient. But the will of HM doesn't seem to count for much in the Ministry of Tourism. Instead they have pursued a policy of intimidation and multiple legal actions.

One suspects there is more to this story, as you might notice that the CAYC land would be a very nice place to have available, should some of that land that end up excess to The Marina's the public's requirements. Some of it could perhaps get given to someone for, say, some beach front development.

Afterall, the Ministry of Tourism's "Senior Adviser to the Minister of Tourism and one of Oman’s most influential tourism figures", one Mohammed Ali Said, has stated his aim is to increase the Sultanate's 4 & 5 star hotel capacity from ~10,000 rooms in 2010 to 25,000 rooms by just 2015. Those Club Meds and Banyan Trees can hardly be put in the middle of Ruwi can they? So what if the CAYC has been there since 1979 providing the ONLY place where ordinary urban Omanis and Expats can keep a small boat at a reasonable price and bring their families to relax in a safe, hassle free environment?

I'd also be interested to know what legal authority the Minister of Tourism thinks gives him the power to single-handedly over-rule legal title and expropriate beach-front land? Isn't this exactly the sort of high-handed attitude that ordinary people here have been protesting against?

In a totally unrelated fact, with nothing to do with the Ministry of Tourism's campaign to get CAYC's land, I'm told Mr. Mohammed Ali Said was the brother in law of the previous Minister of Tourism HE Rajiha bint Abd al-Amir bin Ali. It's a small world.

Speaking of coincidences, it's ironic that on April 17th, BankMuscat’s Corporate Banking Team had
a day out at the CAYC which was full of excitement, fun and activities. “BankMuscat’s team truly enjoyed their day out at the CAYC and would like to thank the club’s management for a job well done”, Said Afaf Al Humaid who was organizing the event from the Bank.



Perhaps Said could call his old boss the Minister and ask him to keep his land-grabbing hands off what is already an excellent public venue for all residents of Oman, Omani and Expat alike?

*Yeti beach was redeveloped by MoT as a mega Integrated Tourist Development complex of private houses, 5 star hotels and expensive golf courses and marinas. Except the only thing to happen in the past 3 years is the beach was taken and the bay filled in with masses of imported rocks and sand to create more building area. The development is suspended.

**The six member CAYC committee is fully elected by members and comprises 4 Omanis and 2 Expats.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Capital Area Yacht Centre [CAYC] under renewed attack from latest Minister of Tourism

Photo: Capital Area Yacht Centre, CAYC, Oman. Marina Bandar Rowdha is just visible next door.

Background
Regular readers will know that Muscat's Capital Area Yacht Centre has been under attack from the Ministry of Tourism and their various bully-boys (such as OMRAN) for some time.

The previous Minister of Tourism, HE Rajiha bint Abd al-Amir bin Ali, recently passed away after loosing a battle with cancer. She was replaced by Mohsin Bin Mohammed Al Shaikh in February, but he was swiftly moved on in the big March-protests' cabinet reshuffle to become an advisor at the Diwan of Royal Court with Ministerial rank.

His replacement, Sheikh Abdulmalik bin Abdullah bin Ali al Khalili, was perhaps a surprising choice for Minister of Tourism. Previously he was strictly a money-man, chairman of BankMuscat and chairman of the Board's Audit Committee since 2001. Additionally, he served as the executive president of the Pension Fund of the Diwan of the Royal Court.

He might be new in the job, but his underlings made sure he got right onto the CAYC.


New Minister refuses to meet 'Expats'.
Demands CAYC move

I'm reliably told that HE Sheikh Abdulmalik requested a meeting on 25th April with CAYC's representatives in order to 'discuss the future of CAYC'. All the elected CAYC committee members** duly attended at the Ministry, but after being kept waiting for over an hour, they were informed that the minister would not meet the committee because there were two British expatriates present. He only wanted to talk to Omanis.

Really. (I wonder what he's got against expats? Maybe they don't respond as easily to the ol' Vitamin W?)

A new meeting was thus arranged for May 3rd, with only the Omani committee members present as instructed. They attended the meeting and were then told by the good Sheikh Abdulmalik that CAYC had to move to Azaiba, and the present beach would be made into a 'public beach'. End discussion. (Afterall, the Ministry of Tourism is reknowned for doing things for the benefit of the Omani public. Just look at what they did to Yeti, a beautiful public beach*.)

Azaiba, of course, is a pretty terrible place for a yacht club, being on a long stretch of boring sandy beach far away from the nice rocky bits one would actually sail a boat around. Places like, er, exactly where CAYC is already located. Although perhaps a banker can be excused for not knowing that.

I do have to wonder if the new Minister actually got a proper unbiased briefing of the CAYC situation (e.g. summary of previous meetings, Directives from H.M., and all the various court cases) from his senior advisor and Director of Tourism Mr. Mohammed Ali Said?


Photo: One of Oman’s most influential tourism figures.


Because the very same Mohammed Ali Said is also on the steering committee of the Marina Bandar Al Rowdha next door to CAYC. Rumour has it he has vowed to take the beach from CAYC for use by the Marina. Coincidentally, the Marina has been struggling financially ever since it opened, and does not currently have a nice beach of its own.

It seems very odd that The Ministry of Tourism feel themselves to be under no obligation to respect the title to the land personally given by His Majesty Sultan Qaboos to the CAYC.

[from CACY website]
His Excellency Mohammed Zubair officially opened the Capital Area Yacht Centre located on a beach, which was known locally as ‘Lone Tree Beach’, near Sidab on Saturday 2nd June 1979. This was the culmination of a good deal of community spirit, effort and imagination and very soon blossomed into the success story of Lone Tree Beach. The intention was to provide a safe beach and boat club with social facilities and amenities open to all residents of Oman, and also to provide a relaxed meeting place.
...
A meeting was held in the Ruwi Hotel in December 1976 to discuss the possibile formation of a beach club in Oman and a site was selected in the Sidab area then known as Lone Tree Beach. His Majesty Sultan Qaboos Bin Said, graciously granted the use of the land on condition that the Club should be open to anyone resident in Oman, and that it should be financially self-sufficient....


The centre can be joined by any resident of Oman to this day, and is financially self sufficient. But the will of HM doesn't seem to count for much in the Ministry of Tourism. Instead they have pursued a policy of intimidation and multiple legal actions.

One suspects there is more to this story, as you might notice that the CAYC land would be a very nice place to have available, should some of that land that end up excess to The Marina's the public's requirements. Some of it could perhaps get given to someone for, say, some beach front development.

Afterall, the Ministry of Tourism's "Senior Adviser to the Minister of Tourism and one of Oman’s most influential tourism figures", one Mohammed Ali Said, has stated his aim is to increase the Sultanate's 4 & 5 star hotel capacity from ~10,000 rooms in 2010 to 25,000 rooms by just 2015. Those Club Meds and Banyan Trees can hardly be put in the middle of Ruwi can they? So what if the CAYC has been there since 1979 providing the ONLY place where ordinary urban Omanis and Expats can keep a small boat at a reasonable price and bring their families to relax in a safe, hassle free environment?

I'd also be interested to know what legal authority the Minister of Tourism thinks gives him the power to single-handedly over-rule legal title and expropriate beach-front land? Isn't this exactly the sort of high-handed attitude that ordinary people here have been protesting against?

In a totally unrelated fact, with nothing to do with the Ministry of Tourism's campaign to get CAYC's land, I'm told Mr. Mohammed Ali Said was the brother in law of the previous Minister of Tourism HE Rajiha bint Abd al-Amir bin Ali. It's a small world.

Speaking of coincidences, it's ironic that on April 17th, BankMuscat’s Corporate Banking Team had
a day out at the CAYC which was full of excitement, fun and activities. “BankMuscat’s team truly enjoyed their day out at the CAYC and would like to thank the club’s management for a job well done”, Said Afaf Al Humaid who was organizing the event from the Bank.



Perhaps Said could call his old boss the Minister and ask him to keep his land-grabbing hands off what is already an excellent public venue for all residents of Oman, Omani and Expat alike?

*Yeti beach was redeveloped by MoT as a mega Integrated Tourist Development complex of private houses, 5 star hotels and expensive golf courses and marinas. Except the only thing to happen in the past 3 years is the beach was taken and the bay filled in with masses of imported rocks and sand to create more building area. The development is suspended.

**The six member CAYC committee is fully elected by members and comprises 4 Omanis and 2 Expats.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Thank you to followers of Muscat Confidential... and a repost of Muscat Mutterings Rock Bottom assault

Firstly, a big thank you to all of the readers and the 1,825 Facebook followers of Muscat Confidential for making us rank as Number 1 in Oman Collective Intelligence's* list of the top Omani English language blogs.

Associated apologies for being a bit quiet of late. The Dragon is very busy finding treasure for my new employers right now. Normal service will be resumed very soon. Blue City Part III, a shocking report from CAYC, and more details on the misguided Oil Nationalisation 'campaign'.

(*and a special thank you to OCI & Mohammed Al Tamami too, !)

But, time for a very quick repost of Muscat Mutterings report on the violent assault upon a patron by the infamous steroid-muscle-building-mullet-squad that are the 'bouncers' at Rock Bottom, night club of the down-market Ramee Guest Hotel in Qurm. It seems being charged a special cover fee for being Indian-looking is company policy there. And if you get uppity, you get a free GBH!

Photo (file): It's hard to beat Jet Driver's classic snap of the type that bounce at Rock Bottom.

Muscat Mutterings: Rock Bottom's Racism and Violence continues.

...
There were 4 bouncers wearing white shirts in the entrance area to the club, 2 chased after the man, the other two went into the club and presumably called in reinforcements.

Outside, the first of the two bouncers ran up behind the man, who was now walking away, and with absolutely no verbal warnings just smashed his fist into the back of the man's head, dropping him to the floor. More white-shirted bouncers appeared onto the scene, a total of around 15, and proceeded to kick and punch the man who was now on the floor. A white companion of the victim on the floor attempted to pull people off his friend and pull the man up from the ground. This man took a reported 8 punches to his face from the bouncers, and did not throw one single punch in his own defence - purely only looking to save his friend on the ground from a very serious mauling. Thats some dedication right there I'd say.

There were many witnesses, including the Manager of the hotel, a certain "Ms Mimi", who then threatened the white man that the ROP were coming to the scene, and that she had video evidence of assault on her staff. 15 men kicking the living sh** out of one customer victim (of racism) on the floor apparently constitutes assault of her staff.

Now, this may sound like a drunken story of a typical night gone wrong involving bouncers. Except this is an all too common occurrence that happens at the Rock Bottoms club here in Muscat, and these bouncers appear to think that they can get away with stuff like this. And evidentially, they are getting away with this outrageous behaviour.

If you are going out this weekend, consider visiting another bar. Why take the risk of being abused like this, why give an establishment that allows it's staff to act this way your patronage? There are other options out there. Have you experienced problems with the staff at Rock Bottoms? Let us all know below.
...


So please go post your opinions on Rock Bottom at Mr Sythe's blog.

And stay tuned. More blogs coming soon.

And why not 'Like' Muscat Confidential on Facebook while you're here?

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Mass murderer finally gets what he richly deserved

Quick one: Mass murderer Osama Bin Laden, a Saudi man who had done more than anyone in recent history to degrade the reputation of Islam, finally reaped a bit of what he sowed last night when American special forces raided his compound near Islamabad and shot him. He had killed innocent civilians across the globe.




Excellent.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Did you know there was supposed to be a new radio station in Oman: "Merge FM" tangled in red tape.

Photo from Muscat Daily: Appartently the infamous Dragon gang of Sohar (no relation). Update: These 3 are apparently principal bad boy Khalfan bin Said bin Mohammed al Muqbali's cohorts.


We all need a break from informal trade Union protests throughout the usually somnolent Sultanate, and news of evil Dragon Gangs plotting parties with cocktails a-la Molitov in Sohar. At least the press are now helpfully (if unusually) identifying with pictures and names in the Omani press.

This naming and shaming is very strange for the local main stream media, but perhaps the Omani Government is starting to get some help, me thinks, in how to handle propaganda in a more 21st century way. Give these violent miscreants a catchy name! "Dragon gangs"... Sounds terrible. Perhaps Oman's local media are doing what they are told once again.

If it wasn't for Dan in Sohar, we wouldn't really know what was going on at all. Well done and thank you Dan (& Jillian!).


Well, sticking with a media theme, have you heard the latest radio station in Oman on 104.8FM? They are targeting 'cool Omani youth'. Really! At least that's what my media friends in the UAE tell me. It's called "Merge FM".

Oman's new "Merge FM" and their cool new look stationary. Suoper hip and connected to the beat of Oman's young, just not actually broadcasting to Oman's youth right now. K?

You don't have to just believe me, here the new radio station (that doesn't yet exist) is described in 'media marketing creative award-speak' at Dubai Lynx:

Brief Explanation:
The Omani youth lives in a constant struggle to balance local customs with the ever growing western influence. Our goal was to tap into this cultural tension with a positive attitude, creating a brand that was both international and unmistakably Omani.

Describe the brief from the client:
Our client needed to brand their new venture, an English-language radio targeting young Omanis in Muscat.

Description of how you arrived at the final design:
We chose to embrace the change and celebrate the mix of cultures. "Merge" became not just our brand name, but a concept to guide our work. Every piece of design carried on the concept of “merging”, from the message to the way the paper was folded (please have a look at the stationery samples). 5 works of art that portray traditional local elements with a modern perspective were commissioned to renowned Arab artists. These were used as part of all designs to create a strong and lively identity.

Indication of how successful the outcome was in the market:
The radio station is still due to launch soon, but initial business to business activities saw a great response to the fresh new identity.



My friends in Dubai say it has indeed won some awards for ... er... outstanding stationary. And the DJs (imported from the UK and bored out of their brains) have been ready for months, but so far all they've been allowed to broadcast is test tapes due to... red tape.

Given the recent disruptions in Oman's Government and how busy the (not replaced) Minister of Information has been explaining the new policy on what the media should be reporting (ie the Government's POV), who can blame a few hold ups in permits allowing a new Omani radio station, especially one aiming to focus on 'The Omani youth living in constant struggle to balance local customs with the ever growing western influence'. Indeed.

It's all apparently very early days, not to be talked about, hush hush, confidential etc. But perhaps Merge 104.8 FM will one day hum not to the sounds of static, but to the 2 imported* UK DJs who have already been here for 3 months. Watch out Darren Short!!!

Yes, the frustrated unemployed Omani youth is a great media market. Those Kias kitted out with woofers boasting more horse-power than the car's engine need feeding with hip-hop, as the boys endlessly circle the Sohar and Shatti Al Qurm roundabouts, looking for employment attention from girls.

Guys, instead of doing Dragon-gang violence shit, how about protesting that your own home-boy radio station is being blocked from even broadcasting by 'the man'?


*Now, why can't the DJs be Omani DJs, man?

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Blue City Part 2: The money and the big gamble for wealth

Blue City, aka Al Madina A'Zarqa, is now in financial purgatory as the development company has no money, is in default on its multiple contractual sales targets, and cannot repay the debts as obliged under the bond covenants. And that's just what its Chairman says.

Plus, the 80%+ majority owner of the critical Class A and B secured notes is now the Omani Government.

In Part One, I described who was ultimately accountable, and (in part) how it happened. So how does an ace developer start with 32km2 of beach front land plus almost a billion dollars and end up insolvent a few years later? As you might expect, its a long story. So bear with me.

Where did the money go?
Ah, this is an excellent question. While I'll admit I can't answer in as much detail as I'd like, the numbers below are from official Blue City accounts. Cyclone, Ocean, ASIT, BCI, BCC1 (plus various other companies like BCC2/3/4/5/6/7) are all private companies, some registered in Oman, some in the Cayman Islands. They don't normally have to publish public accounts. Here is the original new legal structure of the various companies (click to enlarge):


The original ownership structure of Blue City as impacted by the completely legal (under Omani law) takeover by Cyclone. Note: (1)The Minor shareholdings are usually to preserve the legal rule that limited companies in Oman must have at least 3 shareholders. (2) Oman's Supreme court ruled in June 2010 that AAJH had to transfer all its shares in Ocean and ASIT to Cyclone in consideration for the sum of US$36,289,213.96, (even though the ruling seems to defacto break the 3 owner rule). "The Supreme Court judgment is final and non-appealable."

Fortunately for us readers, it appears that thanks to (1)the legal requirements upon the bond issuer due to their listing laws in Ireland, and (2)the information disclosure terms of the credit insurance policy, there is a lot of information on the Blue City investor website*, and especially items that pertain to BCC1 - the construction company tasked with delivering 'Phase One' and the effective borrower of that money.

Even in these accounts, unfortunately, I can't see enough forensic detail to completely say where it all went, especially wrt shareholders. But it's a good start.

*Note that the Blue City site has a hidden disclaimer that says it's not happy if anyone reproduces anything on that site anywhere, so please note that none of the information presented in this blog comes from that website. The information on Muscat Confidential was therefore obtained elsewhere in good faith.


First: Getting the money. The loan of $925 million
OK. The 32km2 land at Al Sawadi was sold freehold by the Omani Government to ASIT in return for OR32 million in cash, along with a whole heap of covenants to protect the country (more on these later).

The land at Al Sawadi the Government sold for Blue City. Note the 'extra' 4 -5 km2 of land ASIT had rights to get, but were not included in the loan or Blue City.


The original partners: Mr Ahmed Janahi (AAJH), & HE Anees Isaa Mohamed Al Zadjali and HH Sayyid Haitham bin Tariq Al Said (Cyclone), came up with a plan to develop the land, buy Al Sawadi Beach hotel, and eventually build a new city for 250,000 people. All they needed was a loan to get it all going.

If it came off as planned, the owners of Ocean would net around 15% of the final sales price of $3.1 billion in profit - a sweet $450 million. And that was just from Phase 1 (of 8)! Plus on top of that they had the 'secret' 4km2, probably worth another $200 million, and the utilities company profit, plus Al Sawadi beach hotel, some golf courses and hotels.

They pre-invested in a Phase One Master Design plan calling for around 5200 apartments and villas, 2 golf courses (total 27 holes), a marina, some new hotels and retail; got permission from the Ministry of Tourism to build it as an Integrated Tourist Complex (including a Royal decree), had the Council of Ministers bless the idea, and contracted a big international construction company to build it all for a fixed fee of around 1.8 billion. The sales prices (at around US$2,200 - $2,500 per sq. m) were perhaps pricey, but were less expensive than similar projects in Oman or the UAE.

The company then started with $925 million, borrowed by issuing several classes of "notes" or bonds to mainly Japanese institutional investors, with varying degrees of 'security' (ie, with or without the rights to most of the land) and varying interest rates. The senior bonds were rated above 'junk' by Fitches and Moodys.

The initial mortgage was against 25km2 of this 32km2 of land (see map), with ASIT retaining the right to get the rest later. I do not know where ASIT got the US$83 million in cash to buy the land. Note, a year later this land was independently valued at $900 million, and later was even 'valued' at $1.5 to $2 billion.

There was a $400 million insurance policy against default for the senior notes (which could lead to a whole heap of legal battles going forward). With some of the bonds offering interest rates of 13.75%pa plus a discount on purchase of 0.55%, it all looked great**. Bear Stearns had crunched the numbers, the Omani Government was 100% on board, the management structure included a bondholders rep and real world engineers, what could go wrong? AAJH and Cyclone signed up, as did some investors.
(** As long as they could actually sell the properties, off plan, and asap)


OK, they got the loan. Where did the money end up?
This money from the notes was loaned by Blue City Investments (BCI - the issuer of the notes, sitting in the Cayman Islands) to BCC1 (the borrower, here in Oman) under an intra-company loan agreement, with BCC1 also getting another $5 million loan from then partner AAJH. So BCC1 had $930 million.

Oh, but remember some of the notes were issued below par value (at a discount, so the bankers could book a quick paper profit and get their bonuses I guess), so we'll take off the $3.6 million special price: BCC1 = $926.4 million

Wait a moment, that loan didn't come for free, no siree. All that 'assurance', financial engineering and legal stuff had to be paid for. First, the mysterious Oppenheimer Investments AG in Gnome-land, advisors to Blue City and no relation to the famous Oppenheimers of South Africa/London, took a cool $30.4 million in 'fees'. Oppenheimer is a private company and I don't know where all that cash ended up. Bear Stearns also charged some fees for their good name lawyers and bankers, another $30.8 million worth. And then a heap of other 'advisors' and lawyers needed paying too, so that's another $11 million (including $400k for Bank Muscat). Leaving BCC1 = $854 million.

The interest rate of the senior debt was linked to LIBOR + a margin. To make sure this rate couldn't get too high, Bear Stearns was generous enough to cap the interest rate Blue City would be exposed to at just 5.7%pa for the small consideration of $23.9 million upfront. What a deal!

Oh, don't forget that wonderful AXIS insurance policy securing some $400 million of the debt (and ensuring the non-junk bond rating the Japanese needed) had a premium to be paid of course, just $31 million (oh, and putting the future premiums of $26 mill in reserve to make sure they would be paid). Down to BCC1 = $773 million.

Quite a bit of this remaining money was then 'loaned' back to BCI to hold in various escrow 'reserve accounts' at Bank New York Mellon to ensure those initial interest payments could be made. That was another $384 million deduction. (In mid 2009 there was still almost US$290 million left in these accounts, BTW.) So BCC1 now = $390 million.

That original Master plan bullshit development design and fancy artwork needed paying for too. AAJH's people had done that, at an invoiced cost of ... $72 million. So they were paid. But, it also seems likely (and this is speculation on my part) that the strange junior Class D notes worth $70 million were purchased by AAJH by agreement to offset these Masterplan Development Design fees paid to AAJH. But it's still a cheque out the door, signed by Chairman Anees. So now BCC1 = $317 million.

Whew! This borrowing money business isn't cheap! When are we going to actually build something - I thought this was a bloody real estate development? I hear you scream ask? Fair enough. You're right, the builders need paying too.

We now have to pay the upfront payment to the contractor into another set of escrow accounts. This enables AECO to buy things and get stuff going (like camps and equipment), knowing they will be slowly paid off for each invoice they get approved as they end up finally with a 1.8 billion development cost (fixed price remember). It also acts as a sort of buffer of cash if things go wrong. Enough to allow, say, the mortgagees to get stuff finished as required. That's another $131 million please. And lets buy some 'project insurance' too while we're at it, a snip at $2.7 million to Al Ahlia. BCC1 = $184 million.

And we have to 'capitalise' these future BCC2/3/4/5/6/... paper companies owned by ASIT to be ready when the cash from the eager buyers and those future Blue City phases really start to flow, so that's another $4 million into the banks. BCC1 = $180 million & change.

That was all BCC1 had left of that $930 million when it started Blue City back in late 2006. And remember this was the plan upfront, in black and white.

The funding structure for BCC1 as presented before the project was even financed.


Of that remaining money, $20 million was held by Bank NY Mellon in yet another escrow account to pay for the promised Al Sawadi Beach hotel, once purchased by ASIT (although it never was). BCC1 = $160 million.

$50 million was deposited with Bank Muscat locally. Signing authority was with Anees Al Zadjali (Chairman), Ahmed Janahi (Board Director), and Prof Fari (CEO) to start paying for things like parties offices and staff. The remaining $110 million was also with Bank NY Mellon to be dished out for construction bills advised as kosher by the board of BCC1 (where the bond trustee had a nominated member to look out for their interests, Mr Willem De Roo) and BNYM technical advisors, Hill International.


Clear Sailing: Full steam ahead!
And so it began in Jan 2007. Everything was looking great.

The original estimate from Bear Sterns was that Blue City 1 would only get their bank accounts down to $20 million (in the black). The ASIT shareholders still had heaps of money left from all the fees and insurances (the $160 million), a load of great land all freehold, Government support signed in contracts, and a fixed price contract to build it all. All they had to do was sell some 5000 apartments and villas by the sea that didn't exist yet. How hard could that be?

The Blue City project was underway. Loads of money in the bank, borrowed from overseas investors. The owners of Ocean & ASIT were close to making a half a billion dollars in profits. "Trebles all round!"


Blue City in early 2007.


Things then started to go tits up

In Part 3, how the Blue City project was driven to bankruptcy by its owners.

Thursday, March 31, 2011

A requiem for Blue City. As predicted long ago, Government forced to take over and bail out project. Part One.

The sad tale of Blue City
Last week the Omani Government bought out the senior debt bonds or 'notes' of Blue City after the UAE investment company threatened to exercise their right to take the land, as reported in The National:

Oman now owns Blue City project
Bradley Hope
Last Updated: Apr 1, 2011

The fate of the troubled US$20 billion (Dh73.45bn) Blue City project is now in the hands of the Omani government after its sovereign wealth fund acquired the debts of the developer.

Onyx Investments, a company fully owned by the Oman Investment Fund (OIF), bought from Essdar Capital Managers nearly all of the class A1 and A3 notes issued by Blue City, the companies said.

Essdar, an investment company in Dubai that is part-owned by members of the Abu Dhabi and Dubai Royal Families, bought $655.5 million of the debt at a steep discount last year as the Blue City project faltered.

Essdar's original plan was to use the power designated to the class A bond holders to restructure the project. When that failed because of legal complexities, Essdar planned to foreclose on the project and sell the land. But in the end it chose to sell the debt to a third party.

Neither Essdar nor the OIF would comment on the sale price or plans for the project now that it belongs to the Omani government.
...


Essdar did claim to be happy with the transaction, so presumably made a tidy profit on the deal. I'll try to explain what happened. It's a long story, so this is part one.

The Blue City project, aka Al Madina A'Zarqa, will be very familiar to regular readers of Muscat Confidential. Over the years, it has been a topic of regular posts. Some of the comments sections were the most fun, with outsiders noting the likely failure and iffy dealings even before the regional real estate meltdown, while Blue City apologists (and probably anonymous employees/management) kept abusing us with ad hominem attacks and saying everything would be great.

We now know the result of all that hubris and greed: bankruptcy, default on almost US$1 billion in internationally sourced loans and contractor debts, a deserted & hardly completed building site, the local people of Al Sawadi disenfranchised from their land, and in the end well over a half billion dollars from the Oman Government savings account used to buy out the class A bonds that held the mortgage on the land.

It is Oman's largest bankruptcy ever. 2% of GDP, nearly 10% of net annual oil exports, was lost, in the process damaging Oman's international reputation as a place of investment opportunity (or perhaps cementing our growing reputation as a place of corrupt and unethical dealings plagued by insider trading?).

I'll try to address a few obvious questions:
Who is responsible?
How did it happen?
Where did the money go?
What does the future hold?

Who is responsible?
The answer is easy: The two 50/50 Omani shareholders in local company Cyclone LLC, the ultimate owner of this disaster, who have been in total control of the project from the beginning:


HE Anees Issa Mohamed Al Zadjali was one owner, and as Chairman of the various local companies had effective executive control over the 'development'. He is the son of Issa Al Zadjali - the owner of local newpapaper Times of Oman - and gains his 'His Excellency' title by virtue of being the Honorary Consul of the Republic of Lithuania.



His Highness Sayyid Haitham bin Tarik Al Said, Minister of Heritage and Culture of the Sultanate of Oman (and the Sultan's cousin) is the other owner. HH kept his Ministerial position in the recent reshuffles and reorganisations of the Ministers following the protests.

Neither of the owners had any significant experience of property development.

HH Sayyid Haitham Al Said, as a Minister and member of the ruling Al Said royal family, certainly brought the support of his cousin, the Sultan, and presumably arranged for the purchase of the land from the Government, the various guarantees and permits required, as well as the promise of the required infrastructure that would be needed to link Blue City with the rest of the country - roads, power, water etc. And let's not forget all the eventual Government expenditure that would be part of the vision to attain critical mass, building and funding public hospitals, schools, ROP and other Government services.

It's not clear how Anees Al Zadjali ended up as co-owner in charge of a $15 billion real estate development project. He could bring some free press, as editor and partner of The Times of Oman media group, and he has various other minor business interests in media and agriculture. Due to his involvement in the Blue City project he incredibly even made the UK Times' 2007 list of the Twenty-five shaping tomorrow’s world of Middle East business. Unfortunately the headline probably still holds true, although it's not the sort of future that was being envisioned in 2007.


How did it happen?
The more complex answer shares the blame out somewhat, but doesn't take away the accountability of the two above. The now defunct Ministry of National Economy was involved, naturally, as was the Ministry of Tourism. Bank of New York Mellon were supposedly providing oversight on behalf of the bond holders. The bond purchasers themselves (apparently mostly Japanese investors) were enticed by the nice returns on a seemingly foolproof deal, administered by Bank NY Mellon and secured by a mortgage on most of the land.

Instigator of the project, Bahraini developer Mr. Ahmed Abubaker Janahi through his holding company AAJH, apparently arranged the bonds through a shady Swiss outfit and committed to a whopping $25 million fee for the $925 million in bonds. AAJ also set up the project's vision, got the original master plan drafted, and essentially enabled the project's initiation. He was subsequently bullied off his 70% piece of the project by then 30% shareholders Cyclone, and despite a series of lawsuits, ultimately lost. Local bank Bank Muscat agreed to provide mortgages to purchasers. Various international consultants took their large up-front fees to agree to design unbuilt golf courses, manage non-existant hotels, and even Sir Norman Foster's company did a massive redesign once Cyclone has taken over (as persona non-grata AAJH had done the original design).

The favorite scapegoat of those involved for the project's abject failure will certainly be the regional collapse of the Middle East Real estate market in late 2008, especially for such mega 'off-plan' integrated developments. Certainly the pre-crash bubble environment was infectively optimistic. Anything seemed possible, even ultimately hallucinogenic-ally ambitious and uneconomic projects like Blue City (touted at the time at an eventual $20 billion, Blue City was by far the largest proposed development in the entire region).

I don't buy that excuse for a moment. The project was mis-managed from the start, and hundreds of millions of dollars in borrowed money spent like there was no tomorrow. The Omani partners, once the bond was sold, instead of getting on with the project and their 30% share of it immediately started trying to take all of it, presumably with visions of their 100% cut of the profits on $20 billion in their eyes, even before they started breaking ground. This not only delayed the project by over a year, so that opportunities pre-crash for lots of sales were lost, it wasted more money in redesigns and continuing expenses. The project then slowly and expensively spiraled into bankruptcy.

Anees Al Zadjali, as co-owner and Chairman, surrounded himself with a very highly paid entourage of sub-par real estate people, and of course had no significant real estate development experience himself. Eventually, experienced American developer Richard Russell was lured from the UAE (perhaps not difficult to do as Dubai had collapsed) to take over as Managing Director and CEO. I think Richard did the best he could. By the time he was there, and given the penchant of Anees for micro-management, the project was already doomed, at least in terms of the original scope. Overhead costs were out of control.

Spin - always Blue City's forte - began to be the only thing the project team was good at; constantly using the name of His Majesty and 'his vision'; buying winning 'awards' for a still imaginary development; issuing glowing press releases for every little contract awarded; even getting deposits on around 500 unbuilt properties; whilst generally failing to achieve anything of consequence.

Disputes happened with almost every contractor and subcontractor, in a textbook example of a failed execution of relationship management. Project management consultants Bovis walked off and sued. Engineering consultants ACE ended up appealing to Bank NY Mellon about being unpaid for over $4 million in fees, and they walked too. AAJH, someone who at least had some experience in developments of this scale, continued to seek recompense in the Omani courts and failed, and even offered to come back in for 50/50. His offers to help rescue the project were spurned by Cyclone.

In desperation, advance funds paid to the contractor that should have been reserved until the end for building phase 1 apartments and villas were redirected to try to build a hotel in time for the Asian Beach Games in late 2010, which it seems the Management promised to the Omani Government to try to regain some credibility. This blew the last of the available money, as Bank Mellon turned off the taps following repeated failures of BCC1 to meet contractual sales targets and Cyclone declined to inject more of their own money to meet their obligations.


Photo: Blue City is now just a wasteland of partially completed concrete buildings and foundations. Not much has changed since this was taken in late 2009.


The Asian Beach games went ahead anyway. The hotel was never built, finally reaching just 26% completion (see photo), as detailed in a terse letter last month by Hill International, appointed by Bamk NY Mellon as the noteholders' technical advisor to the project since 2007:

From Hill International (UK) Ltd
TO: Blue City Company 1 SAOC

11 Mar 2011

... Notwithstanding the above, according to the work schedule that was adopted under the unapproved Addenda, BCC1 used a significant part of the balance of the Advance Payment towards funding design and construction works of the Amphitheatre Hotel, a non-residential, not sold, non revenue-generating for debt service, section of the development. We understand that this was due to a promise of BCC1’s/ASIT’S Chairman to higher Omani officials to have the hotel operational during the Asian Beach Games that were to be held in Oman in December 2010.

Despite depleting the balance of the AP, construction of the Project stopped anyway later on in the absence of additional funding being secured by BCC1. The Contractor suspended works in December 2009, with construction works at the hotel reaching a 26.5% completion stage (according to the Contractor’s progress reports)...


The full letter is a very interesting read.

Blue City management presented a 'restructuring' proposal to the bondholders (of the senior notes, by then mostly owned by the UAE investment vehicle ESSDAR) in August 2010. You can read the full thing here.

In their presentation, the failure of the project is blamed on pretty much everything other than Blue City management.

Quote:
...
The project is facing difficult times on account of:
• Excessive and expensive debt burden being borne by the project
• Onerous debt covenants
• Inflexible construction contract
• Global financial meltdown that has severely affected regional property market
• Continued global economic weakness affecting property off‐take/investor confidence
• General negative publicity surrounding the project (Ratings, Shareholder dispute)
• Master plan changes, design changes and delayed sales releases


Among other things, the Blue City team proposed a cunning plan consisting of selling off the hotel(s) and most of the rest of the land to get some cash to finish a reduced Phase 1 development. Their proposal included debt write-offs, re-negotiating the the contract with the contractor, dumping various oversight entities such as Fitch(!), releasing the company from agreed sales obligations, zero interest payments, and even the help of the note holders to find people willing to buy the properties.

Notable by its absence was an offer to change out the senior management and governance structure of the project, given that most of the above list was agreed and executed by ASIT. After all, this situation was hardly the fault of the outstanding Chairman HE Anees Al Zadjali.

The explicit threat to the note holders was that the Government would cancel the concession and they'd be lucky to get anything. Not surprisingly, the UAE decided instead to sell the notes to the Omani Government and book a tidy profit.

Can you blame them?

So now the Government is in the driving seat, paying good money to avoid an embarrassing foreign foreclosure on the land that was theirs to start with. What a mess.

In the end, Blue City's shareholders started with over 25km2 of almost free land in one of the most beautiful parts of Oman's coast, full support from the Government and $900 million in cash. Within a few years they ended up with some piles of concrete and a trail of debts, broken promises and litigation.


In part two: Where the money went, and the way forward.

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Corruption in Oman: Redux

Corruption.
It was, truth be told, the topic of my first actual post way back in Sept 2007 (that does seem an age ago...)

It is that aspect of Omani society that is driving the continued polically inspired protests in Oman: the commonly held view that there is significant high-level corruption in this country. A few quotes:

Arabian Business, 18th January
"Oman protestors call for fight against corruption"
...Protesters chanted slogans calling for an end to corruption and carried banners saying “Rising prices have destroyed the dreams of ordinary citizens”...


Financial Times March 15th:
"Oman protesters demand corruption investigation"
In spite of a series of concessions made by Sultan Qaboos bin Said al-Said, the ruler, protesters in Oman are demanding that former ministers be investigated for alleged corruption, according to reports.
...
Despite these concessions, protesters have gathered outside the Majlis al-Shoura building in Muscat, the capital, demanding that a new police chief investigate some of the ministers sacked since unrest started to grip the country.

“The new inspector general must immediately do his job and investigate the sacked ministers for corruption when they were in power,” one demonstrator told Reuters on Tuesday.

Several of the former ministers are members of prominent business families.
...


And perhaps most tellingly, as it was printed in Muscat Confidential's favourite throbbing organ of the local 4th Estate Times of Oman (normally fully aligned with the position of the Omani Government establishment), on March 22nd:
"7,000 sign memo to seek trial"
MUSCAT: Seven thousand protestors from all over the Sultanate signed a memorandum seeking the trial of ousted corrupt ministers and submitted it to Attorney General of Oman Hussain Bin Ali Al Hilali, yesterday.

“Ousting the corrupt ministers and officials will not resolve the prevailing issues in the Sultanate. For the last two decades, these corrupt bigwigs have plundered our country’s wealth. So, they should not be allowed to walk scot-free. They should face the court and stand trial,” Khalil Al Saidi, a protestor, told Times of Oman.

On March 7, His Majesty Sultan Qaboos bin Said responded to unprecedented demonstrations in the Sultanate by conducting a radical cabinet reshuffle and sacking a total of 12 ministers.

“All the financial dealings of the former ministers must be investigated. Their bank accounts, their trips to foreign countries and their investments in various fields should be probed in detail,” Salima Al Rajhi, a protester at the Majlis Al Shura Council headquarters in Muscat, said.

Protestors have put up tents and are staging a sit-in in front of the Majlis Al Shura Council headquarters in Muscat demanding certain social reforms and end to corruption since February 28.

“Ousting the corrupt ministers and reshuffling the cabinet is a positive move. But it is a cosmetic change. Now, we want trial of these corrupt ministers. If His Majesty the Sultan has sacked the corrupt ministers then it shows that we were correct.

Those corrupt ministers should be taken to court. His Majesty the Sultan should not let those corrupt ministers go scot-free. All the murky dealings should be investigated. They should stand trial for misusing public funds. Let them face the court. If they are innocent then they can go and if they are not, they should face the trial. They have plundered our nation a lot,” Khalil added.

In the memorandum, the protestors have demanded that the trial should be open. The proceedings should be made public and those who are found guilty should be given moral punishment.

“The funds of ousted ministers, advisors and officials should be frozen until the probe is completed. The real estate dealings of these bigwigs should also be probed. We know that most of these corrupt people own property in prime locations.

Such lands’ ownership should be considered as leased property in lieu of which rents have to be paid to the state treasury,” Khalil said.

The protestors signing the authorisation urged the Public Prosecution to act as an attorney on their behalf.

“We have urged the release of all developments related to these issues including trials in the presence of the media,” Khalil added.

The memorandum relies on the economic principles stated in the State Basic Law issued by Royal Decree No. 101/1996, which states that “all natural resources are considered property of the state” and stipulated preservation and optimal utilisation of natural resources for the interest of the national economy.

“The petition is based on Article 52 of the State Basic Law, which states that each member of the Council of Ministers is answerable to His Majesty the Sultan.

Article 53 of the same law stipulates that any of the members of the Council of Ministers should not hold chairmanship or membership of a board of a joint stock company and that the government units they run or supervise on should not deal with any company or establishment wherein they have direct or indirect interests. But we can some see violations here. So this should be probed,” said a protestor.

“Future actions will be decided on the outcome of the decision taken by the public prosecution,” protestors added.


You get the idea. Some of it is perhaps pure jealousy. There are some rich people in Oman. Some of them got rich because of hard work, often via trading and generally being good at business. Hey, afterall, Oman is a capitalist system, with no personal income tax or wealth tax and a very low tax on corporate profits at just 12.5%.

Some have gotten rich by doing very little except being the local 'sponsor' of a foreign company, as until recently pure foreign companies would pay 30% income tax, or they could form a local LLC and pay 12.5% but then had to have an Omani sponsor to be able to register a local company. And they tended to pick Omanis who were 'well connected' to be their sponsor, as the sponsor could therefore earn their 5% or 10% commission by 'helping' get Government contracts, and smoothing the planning and permitting processes via their contacts in the Ministries, especially the Ministry of Manpower.

So far I haven't seen any real evidence of this 'corruption' presented in the protesters' arguments. It has all seemed to be based on rumour and scuttlebutt, and the fact that, indeed, many (ex)Ministers are apparently pretty wealthy and own some sweet real estate.

Yet, tales do abound of corrupt Government officials in Oman being occasionally removed from office for corruption, and that they are not punished in the courts to avoid letting ordinary people know that it happened and/or to avoid blaming the Government people tasked with stopping that sort of thing, and/or to avoid bringing shame to their family. This last 'reason' is also used to justify the weird Omani practice of not allowing people convicted of crimes to be identified in the newspapers (in fact, as far as I'm aware, it would be illegal to publish the name or photo of an Omani even after they have been found guilty and sentenced in a public court!)

The very public demolition of the new building next to the airport owned by ex-Minister HE Dr Juma Al Juma was never reported in the traditional Omani media, despite being the talk of the chattering classes. The ex-Head of Muscat Municipality, Eng. Abbas was fired in part over that incident (he authorised the permits for the height despite it being in breach of FIA regulations) and his own alledged misuse of power to get his own building development in Shatti, among many other tales of similar abuses.

There are other obviously suspicious situations. The purchase of WorldCall by Omantel at super inflated prices from a single Omani businessman always raised eyebrows, as blogged here at the time. Result? (after a colossal 95% loss on the US$185mill investment) The CEO later 'resigned for personal reasons' and was then made an undersecretary at the telecoms regulator! So clearly nothing wrong there at all.

Other rumours I've heard. The inflated (200%) prices Gulf Air apparently paid for airplanes in the 90s was never investigated. The extremely low prices (I'm told at a price is equal to just $5/bbl oil equivalent) Oman's scarce natural gas has been sold on fixed long term contracts with no link to either oil price nor inflation to makers of methanol. The rumoured dismissal (but again, no trial) of a Government tenderboard member a couple of months ago for taking 30k rial (US$75,000) payments for assigning contracts to the payers. All just rumours.

But we all know, wasta is wasta. Who gets given nice valuable pieces of free land? Who gets their kids educated overseas at the state's expense? Whose pieces of land in the middle of no-where happen to get roads built and infrastructure laid that dramatically increase the land's value? Whose houses get built slowly by contractors working on big contracts for your Ministry/Municipality? Answer: Those who are connected to the royal family, Ministers, and the powerful. Those with 'wasta'.

We can all see the wastafarian kids of the Ministers and Oligarchs driving around in their Porsches, Lambos and Ferraris. We can see the palaces of the wealthy families along the coast and their private yachts parked in the jetty. The natural question is: where is that money coming from?

Overseas companies tendering for contracts in Oman are continually approached by people who claim - in exchange for an appropriately sized fee - to be able to guarantee their tender will win the contract.

Here is a wonderful 15 min talk by Peter Eigen, founder of excellent NGO Transparency International, on the impact of corruption and what people can do about it.


Video: How to expose the corrupt, talk by Peter Eigen, Founder of anti-corruption NGO Transparency International



Of major concern is that the Sultanate is still not a signatory to The UN Convention against Corruption. Why is this?
...
The UN Convention against Corruption provides a clear framework of laws and actions required to prevent and punish abuse of power for private gain. It addresses the cross-border nature of corruption, includes provisions on the return of ill-gotten assets, and it mandates the participation of citizens and civil society organizations in accountability processes. In the region, only Oman, Syria and Saudi Arabia have not ratified it.
...


This might be a good question for the coordinator for the Arabic Countries at the International Association of Anti-Corruption Authorities (IAACA) Sh. Ali Nasser Al-Bualy, formerly the first Omani Attorney General for the Sultanate of Oman and local legal big wig.

In fact, I'm hoping The ex-Public Prosecutor and Attorney General will help us unravel this problem....